Tom -- you definitely have shown that Raimondo lied. But isn't this sort of like shooting ducks in a barrel? (Only sort of, since shooting into a barrel is no doubt less painful that reading Raimondo's writing.)

I don't know if exposing JR's raving is really worth the effort -- does he have much of a following at all?

Well, knocking down idiocy is always a legitimate enterprise regardless, and if you keep posting that cool photo I'll keep reading.

Raimondo has been a dishonest idiot since the 1970s. Even other rothbardian-wackos have learned to hate him:

"The Big Lies of Justin Raimondo"

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/9167/justlies.html

You know you are a true asshat wack-turd when weirdo crazy movementarians like SEK3 (RIP) think you are dishonest and shifty.

I know it may sound prudish, but I'd rather not have scatological references on my web site. I have banned a small handful of others for racist references (e.g., Stephan Kinsella) and for tastelessly explicit sexual references (Justin Raimondo). Please, no more scatological references. I don't like Mr. Raimondo's open disregard for truth, either, but I would prefer that he be defended or criticized in civil terms.

The upside-down Raimondo isn't as funny as the previous one. :-)

TGP:

"I know it may sound prudish, but I'd rather not have scatological references on my web site. I have banned a small handful of others for racist references...and for tastelessly explicit sexual references"

It's good to know Tom, prudish though he may appear, still allows tasteful explicit sexual references...

:-)

Ross Levatter